All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. As to the summary of the grounds for appeal, the defendant asserts that the defendant's imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) declared by the court below is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the prosecutor is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include: (a) the fact that the Defendant both recognized and reflected the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s request from E and stored the instant penphone; and (c) the Defendant could have the same criminal records; but (d) the criminal records of the Defendant could not be punished last, for a considerable period of time, for a considerable period of time from around 2007.

On the other hand, even though the defendant had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had been

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation, etc. and the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, and there are no changes in circumstances that may otherwise determine the original judgment and the sentence, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed excessively heavy or excessively unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant and the prosecutor’s above assertion are rejected.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.