beta
Text
Defendant
Of the facts stated in the judgment against C, the number of crimes Nos. 1 and 2 of the 2013 Highest 432 case are listed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Records】
1. On July 16, 2004, at the Incheon District Court, Defendant C was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud; on November 17, 2008, to a fine of five hundred thousand won for fraud; on February 5, 2008, at the same court, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for fraud; on November 15, 2009, the summary order of KRW 5 million was issued by the same court on November 15, 2009; and on February 16, 2010, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the crime of forging, forging, or uttering of forged private documents.
In addition, on July 13, 2011, the same court was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution due to fraud, fabrication of private documents, or uttering of falsified documents, etc., and the judgment was finalized on the 21st of the same month.
On the other hand, the above defendant was prosecuted by the same court on October 30, 2012 as the crime of forging private documents and is currently under trial proceedings.
(2) On May 12, 2014, Defendant E was indicted by fraud, etc. and is currently in trial at the Incheon District Court (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul District Court”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul District Court”) at the present Incheon District Court. On April 10, 2014, Defendant E was indicted on May 12, 2014, and was currently in trial at the Seoul Central District Court (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul District Court”)
(2014 Highest 2130, 2014 Highest 2054). 3. Defendant ID was indicted on September 25, 2013 with the Incheon District Court and is currently under trial.
(2013 Highest 5949, 2013 Highest 7481, 2014 Highest 3737). 【Criminal Facts】 [2013 Highest 4322] - Defendant C and E C have resided in the middleest AE of Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant housing”) and had concluded a lease contract by paying a large amount of deposit money without any fact that they had concluded a lease contract, Defendant C and C have attempted to borrow money from victims by forging the documents under the name of the lessor AF and making victims know of the victims by presenting forged documents, and around May 201, Defendant C had attempted to forge a part of AF of a document under the name of the Plaintiff EF in the name of the victim.