logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.06.02 2016가단115760
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 26, 2007, around 10:30 on December 26, 2007, the Defendant: (a) around the 10:30, the Defendant shocked C, which was prone to a pedestrian, on the road, and suffered two structural aggregates by shocking C, which was prone to a pedestrian.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

Dongbu Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Dongbu Fire") is an insurer who has taken over automobile insurance with respect to the above urbane, and the plaintiff is a son and son and son's 2 son and son's children.

C. C died on March 15, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, purport of whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion that C died because of the accident of this case, it was difficult for C to send three months of disability 97.5%, and the heir of C and his heir of the accident of this case reached an agreement with the Eastern Fire, the insurer of the accident of this case, in 2009 and 2014, but there was no agreement with the defendant with the defendant. Thus, the defendant asserts that C is responsible for compensating the plaintiff for damages caused by the accident of this case, which was delegated by C's children.

3. According to the reasoning of the judgment of the court below, C and its children receive 17,540,00 won as well as 117,540,00 won as well as 117,540 won as well as 117,00 won as well as 25,00 won as well as 25,000 won as well as 20,000 won as well as 3 and 3. The above agreement entered into between C and 3 and 3 on June 30, 2014 can be acknowledged as having been concluded between C and 117,540,00 won as well as 117,00 won as well as 117,540,000 won as well as 1,000 won as well as 1,000 won as well as 1,000 won as to the defendant's agent and insurer. Thus, the above agreement is valid between the plaintiff and 200.

arrow