The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant, at the site warden from September 1, 2016 to November 24, 201 of the same year, performed sewage pipes construction work at the Dacheon-si D, one of the following: (b) around October 8, 2016; (c) the Defendant damaged the victim’s market value by removing five renunciation of his/her ownership on the part of the victim F, which was installed on the road surface, from September 1, 2016 to around September 14, 2016.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the records of the instant case are consistently changed from the investigative agency to the present court: (i) the Defendant: (a) from the investigation agency to the present court, the Defendant removed the miscellaneous trees owned by the victim; (b) there was no damage to the miscellaneous trees; (c) at the time of the removal of miscellaneous trees, the Defendant was elected by the victim on his own by giving compensation for the worships owned by the victim within the said miscellaneous trees and the construction area; and (d) later, the victim did not pay the amount initially agreed upon upon upon upon upon the request of the victim for a larger amount of compensation; and (b) the victim took a trip around October 201 in this court.

Miscellaneous trees are removed in front of the house, and the degree of abandonment of 4 to 5 is damaged, and the drilling was directly extracted.

According to the following: (a) the Defendant stated to the effect that he did not fluorize her friend, and that he was fluoring her fluoring because she was removed from her fluoring; and (b) the Defendant’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluorial image taken around October 8, 2016, it appears that the fluor’s fluor’s fluor was removed at the time of the above shooting; (c) the fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluoration was not confirmed; (d) the Defendant’s fluor