1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Basic Facts

The reasons are as follows.

subsection (1) of the judgment of the first instance court is referred to as "1. Basic Facts".

Then, the entry of Gap evidence No. 15 is added to the relevant part, except for the addition of the entry of Gap evidence No. 15, which is the same as the corresponding part of the Civil Procedure Act.

E. On October 24, 2016, after the date of adjudication of the first instance court, the Plaintiffs were transferred the land allotted by the co-defendant C (hereinafter “C”) of the first instance court on October 24, 2016 and are currently under possession.

G, the president of the Defendant’s association, the gist of the Plaintiffs’ assertion and determination, is the provisional seizure against the instant land allotted by the Defendant for recompense of development outlay as the debtor, which was conducted by the Defendant for the instant land secured by the development recompense of development outlay (Tgu District Court Port Branching 2015Kadan1832, hereinafter

(2) Defendant C deposited 7,00,000 won of the claim amount to KRW 7,00,000. Defendant C promised to deposit the claim amount to KRW 7,00,000 with the court below’s order to set up the right of collateral security, which is the right of collateral security (right of collateral security), which is the right of collateral security (right of collateral security) of Busan Bank branch in Busan Bank Port, which is the right of collateral security (right of collateral security), and the right of collateral security (right of collateral security), which is the right of collateral security (right of collateral security) to the right of collateral security (right of collateral security) and the right of collateral security (right of collateral security)

The Plaintiffs purchased the instant land secured by the recompense from C with the money borrowed from Daegu Bank, etc., and C deposited the amount of KRW 7,000,000 as a claim for provisional seizure, and the Plaintiffs repaid all the secured obligations of each of the secured claims of the instant land secured by the Busan Bank including Busan Bank and the head of each tax office having jurisdiction over the land secured by the development recompense for the Republic of Korea.

However, notwithstanding the continuous claim of the plaintiffs and C, the defendant shall change the name of the owner on the land secured for recompense of development outlay from C to the plaintiffs.