1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff newly built neighborhood and detached houses (the first and fourth floors, and the fifth floors, detached houses; hereinafter “instant building”) with a size of six stories above ground on the land in Suwon-si, Suwon-si B site 373 square meters, and obtained approval for the use on July 15, 201.

B. When calculating the amount of sewage generated from the building of this case at the time of approval for the use of the building of this case, the Defendant calculated that the amount of sewage generated from the building of this case is less than 10 cubic meters by applying the "one public announcement unit" to "one public announcement unit," and accordingly, did not impose the amount borne by the Plaintiff

C. From February 27, 2012, the Defendant:

3. In the Act on the Special Audit of the Status of Imposition of Sewerage Charges by Causers among Class II neighborhood living facilities, it was pointed out that the total amount of wastewater generated by a public announcement institute shall be calculated by applying the standards of multi-unit houses for similar purposes, but where the fixed number of personnel is unclear, "where 1, which is the basis for calculation of the number of persons to be treated as a septic tank of multi-family houses, shall be calculated as 2 persons per room."

Accordingly, the defendant notified the plaintiff of the scheduled imposition of the amount borne by the sewage burden calculated as two persons per unit of the public notice board, and submitted a written opinion, etc., and on December 3, 2012, the attached Table 1 A to the plaintiff.

The amount borne by the sewage burden of KRW 13,612,00 was notified by attaching the sewage calculation table, such as the statement, to be treated.

E. However, on January 2, 2013, the Plaintiff requested that the foregoing sewerage burden was calculated erroneously, and the Defendant conducted a field investigation on the instant building and confirmed the use status. Of the 21st room that the Plaintiff submitted evidentiary data, it was confirmed that the 15th room among the 21st room that the Plaintiff submitted evidentiary data was installed only for the fixed price and the remaining 6th room, and that the remaining 14th room that was not submitted can not be seen inside.

(f).