1. The part of the instant lawsuit seeking the cancellation of physical grade IV shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's remainder.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 15, 2006, the Plaintiff received a physical examination for conscription and received a determination of physical grade 4 and a disposition to be called to public duty personnel service, but postponed enlistment on the grounds of college study, attendance, etc. from 2006 to 2011.

B. On October 29, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for change of military service disposition (the name of a sick person: Macercerosis). As a result of the follow-up physical examination conducted, the Plaintiff enlisted on February 53, 2012 after being judged at physical grade 4, but was enlisted on February 20, 2012. However, according to the result of the physical examination conducted by the military unit that requires a progress observation (the name of a sick person

C. On November 23, 2012, the results of the follow-up physical examination conducted on November 23, 2012, the Plaintiff was judged as physical Grade 7 (10 months for the healing period) as follows: “Where it is necessary to observe the progress of the observation of the neological disorder” in the attached Table 2 of Article 11 of the Inspection Regulations (hereinafter “the attached Table”) of the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs (hereinafter “the attached Table”).

As a result of the follow-up physical examination conducted on October 4, 2013 after ten months from the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff is among the personality disorders and behavior disorders in attached Table 102.

On April 22, 2014, the defendant applied for a change in the assignment of military service again (a name: a name of illness accompanied by an uneasiness and an uneasiness) to the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant held a regional physical examination committee on April 29, 2014. The above committee held the local physical examination committee on the following occasions. The plaintiff's "the plaintiff's physical examination committee is a personality disorder among disability categories due to symptoms such as instability in appraisal, severe labor, impulse, self-destructive behavior, etc., and symptoms such as ebrmoness and ebrosis continue to exist. However, the plaintiff's face-to-face examination did not observe significant impulses and interest gap, and there is symptoms or functional disorder that can be judged that social and professional functional disorder is high due to border personality disorder.