Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who works at a convenience store in Pyeongtaek-si B.
On November 14, 2016, the Defendant classified emergency bells with customers at the above convenience store, and reported 112 during the dispute with customers. The Defendant was asked from the police box affiliated with the police box affiliated with the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station D, which called “Sae-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S
Accordingly, the defendant assaulted a police officer who was performing legitimate duties concerning the handling of 112 reports, thereby hindering the performance of official duties.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Determination on the application of the sentencing guidelines of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence: The scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines of the applicable O: consideration of all circumstances, including the fact that there exists no criminal history exceeding the fine of the basic area (from June to June) of the first type (in the event of interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) and no damage is serious;