A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of BNEW EF rocketing and passenger cars.

1. On July 9, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) on the grounds of a violation of the said Act on the grounds of a violation of the said Act, and on December 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million for the same crime at the same court, and each of the persons

On February 6, 2018, the Defendant operated the said vehicle at the section of about 10km from the uppermost of about 720-6 in Ansan-si to the uppermost of about 53 Slcheon-ro 53 Slive elementary schools in Ansan-si without obtaining a driver’s license, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.197% in blood, and from the uppermost of about 10km in front of the same Gu.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving) was under the influence of alcohol 0.197% in the date and time indicated in paragraph (1) and under the influence of alcohol 0.197% in blood, the Defendant came to proceed at the speed of the Sinsan-si, a two-lane road in front of the Sinsan-ro 53 Slsan-ro, an elementary school located in Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, toward the Slsan-do, along that of the Sinsan-do, along the speed of the

A driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to confirm the safety of course by checking the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, as seen above, the Defendant was negligent by neglecting the previous week while under the influence of alcohol and driving it as it is. The Defendant got the front part of the vehicle that the Defendant driven by the victim C, who was under the influence of alcohol, following the volume of DNA car driving in the front section of the vehicle that the Defendant driven.

Ultimately, the Defendant driving the said car in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol, and driving the car to the victim C, and driving the fluoral base in need of a warning for about one week medical treatment, and driving the fluoral base in need of a warning for about one week medical treatment to the passenger E of the damaged vehicle.