A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 24, 2013, the Defendant is driving a C observer car on the front road of the member-gu, Ansan-si around 21:30 on October 24, 2013.

The E-si driven by D, which was driven in the same place, stops on the road of the math and the math, and they do not deduction each other, while D and math, D left the said vehicle without having the said vehicle “dices” to the Defendant, thereby making it impossible for the vehicles that intend to pass the same place thereafter to pass through the road for 20 minutes.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with traffic by making the Defendant go through the land.

2. On October 24, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal to measure a noise level) by leaving a vehicle on the road, as described in paragraph (1), at the G police box located in the F of the members of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, as stated in paragraph (1), and then leaving the vehicle on the road. After receiving a report, the Defendant sent to the scene to the effect that “The Defendant: (a) was able to have the Defendant snick and smell the vehicle by leaving the vehicle as the keys; and (b) carried the vehicle in a snick with the Chief of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station G police box belonging to the G police box of the Gyeonggi-gu, which found the Defendant, and carried the vehicle to the said police box; (c) there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driven while under the influence of alcohol, such as making a smell at the Defendant’s entrance, and snicking the face, and received a request from the above H to take a drinking measuring instrument over about twenty-four minutes.

Nevertheless, the defendant, while avoiding the alcohol level without any justifiable reason, did not comply with the police officer's request for alcohol level measurement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The user ledger of the measuring instruments for drinking;

1. Photographs at the time of crackdown;

1. A photograph refusing to measure drinking;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (to record telephone conversations conversationss);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 185 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (1) 2 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;