Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 10:00 on May 13, 2012, the Defendant: (a) within the “E soup 10:00, the Defendant, within the “Eup 1,” where the Defendant was operated by the Defendant located at the window of Changwon-si, and (b) the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant’s Defendant’s wife was found to be a soup rup rupbryr and the Defendant’s wife and resisted the Defendant’s wife’s wife, thereby causing the Defendant’s injury to the victim, such as the victim’s fating and moving of the bicycle within the soup rup rup rup rupe rup rup rup rup rup, and the victim’s left hand rup rup rup rup rup rup rup rup rup rup rup
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;
1. The statements of witnesses C and F in the third protocol of trial;
1. A statement of inquiry into and reply to the Korean-style hospital;
1. A medical doctor G's inquiry letter;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes adding four weeks to the certificate of injury (five pages of investigation records) and the certificate of injury (C);
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;
1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 23 (3) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits of Dismissal of Application for Compensation (the scope of defendant's liability for compensation against the applicant for compensation is unclear
1. The summary of the argument and the defense counsel acknowledged that the defendant was punished for the above criminal facts, such as the time and place on which the crime was recorded, the defendant was sealed and spawned with the victim in a place where spawn with each other, etc. However, the defendant did not fall under the 4 balance on the left side of the victim in the process, and the defendant did not fall under the 4 balance on the left side of the victim, and even if the defendant had spawn as such, it is difficult to recognize that the above injury was caused by the defendant's act in consideration of the part and degree of the injury.