1. The Defendant’s order of payment order (No. 2015) No. 2672 is authentic, which is the High Government District Court for the Defendant’s High Court for the Republic of Korea.

The defendant filed an application for seizure of corporeal movables with the corporeal movables in C, 413 dong 810, the domicile of which is the resident registration of B, with the title of the payment order issued by the Goyang-si District Court 2015 tea 2672, Goyang-si, the Goyang-si District Court 2015 tea 2672, which is the resident registration of B. The above court execution officer attached movables in the attached list at the above location on September 10, 2015. There is no dispute between the parties.

The plaintiff asserts that the above B does not reside at his own reference or in fact at the above location, and that the movables listed in the attached list are owned by himself.

In full view of the purport of the entire argument in the statement No. 2 of the evidence No. 2, the plaintiff purchased the movables No. 2, 4, and 8 from among the movables listed in the separate sheet in the separate sheet in his/her name and received some of them directly. Thus, each of the above movables is the thing owned by the plaintiff purchased by the plaintiff.

Therefore, compulsory execution against the above movable should not be permitted.

However, the Plaintiff purchased the remaining movables listed in the separate sheet other than the above movables.

We cannot accept the assertion that the remaining movables are owned by the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no evidence to prove that B did not actually reside in the location of the above corporeal movables.

Thus, the claim of this case is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit.