logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.31 2014가합533093 (1)
부당이득금
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff B is the actual operator of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff A was awarded a subcontract for the construction of the E site development project, which was executed by the said C under a contract from the joint Defendant C, around November 2008, and around November 201, 201, for the construction of the E site development project that was executed by the said C under a contract from the Gyeonggi-do Urban Construction Project.

B. From Sep. 2008 to Dec. 2, 2009, the Defendant, as the head of the public service division at the construction site of the said E Site Development Project site from Jan. 2010 to Jan. 2012, 2008, was in charge of construction management, including management, supervision, process, implementation (original contractor), progress payment, change of construction amount, etc., with the delegation of the above C as the head of the site of the same construction site from Jan. 201 to Jan. 2012.

C. The Defendant was sentenced to the Seoul High Court (2014No1847 case) on January 29, 2016, and the above judgment became final and conclusive after being sentenced to the above 1.6 billion won from the Seoul High Court (2014No1847 case) on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant received 1.6 billion won from the Seoul High Court (2 years and 1.72 million won from the 2016th and the surcharge from the 1.7 billion won from the 2016th and the surcharge from the 2016 billion won from the 2016th and the 1.7 billion won from the 1.7 billion won from the 2008 Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court) by taking advantage of the Plaintiff’s subordinate position affected by the construction site manager B, who was the actual operator of Plaintiff A, in connection with his duties, such as the payment of the progress payment or the increase of the construction amount, etc.; and (b) the Plaintiff offered the Defendant with the following 1.670 million won from the 3.

On November 208, 2008, the temporary amount of the sequence 1 30 million office in the G School construction site office adjacent to the G School, which is located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and around July 2009, 50 million office in the work site office adjacent to the J driving range and adjacent to the construction site office located in Young-si, Suwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

arrow