logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.29 2018가단5039795
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

A. In addition, it is sufficient to conclude that part of the items asserted by the Plaintiff as the details of the additional construction works, as indicated below, are already explained in the “Contract Statement” (Evidence A) included in the terms of the contract of this case or the relevant construction documents, such as specifications, etc., and that part of the remainder is difficult to conclude that the Plaintiff additionally performed construction works exceeding the scope of the construction works under the initial contract, on the grounds that there is no obvious evidence to prove that the construction works have been actually performed.

5 Existing 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 30 60 60 60 60 30 60 60 600 60 60 30 60 60 60 60 60 60 30 60 60 60 620 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 30 60 60 60 620 30 60 60 60 60 60 602 60 60

arrow