beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The user, person in charge of maintenance, or driver of any motor vehicle in the facts charged in the instant case shall be prohibited from allowing anyone to drive or from driving any motor vehicle, the devices of which are not maintained in compliance with the Motor Vehicle Management Act, the Construction Machinery Management Act, or orders issued pursuant
Nevertheless, from around 2012 to around 23:00 to around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) dismantled the system of maximum speed restriction on the roads across the nation, such as the Goyang-gu D D D D located in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu; (b) failed to install the devices such as “sprinking, driving distance meters, and other meters” of automobiles; and (c) driven two buses of E and Fnient bus.
2. The burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial for judgment is to be borne by the prosecutor, and the conviction for guilt is to be based on the evidence with probative value sufficient for the judge to have the truth that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt for guilt against the defendant, it is inevitable to determine the defendant as the benefit of the defendant (see Supreme Court Decision 2001Do2823, Aug. 21, 2001). Considering the following circumstances acceptable by the evidence, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged of this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
① A vehicle was newly registered on June 29, 2009, and F vehicle was newly registered on April 12, 2010.
The Defendant purchased vehicles E from around October 9, 2012, and F vehicles from around September 23, 2013, respectively.
From around that time, the defendant seems to have entered each of the above vehicles into the branch of the G M&A.
2. There is no evidence that the defendant has dismantled the device that limits the maximum speed of each vehicle.
On February 2, 2016, the Defendant listens to the horses that the maximum speed limitation system of each of the above vehicles has been unfolded from bus engineers on February 2016.