logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.17 2017고정573
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2017 High 573" is a person who is engaged in driving a CStez first car.

On 14:00 on 21. 201. 21. 201., the Defendant driven the above car and made two lanes in front of the EM store located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon to turn to the left at a speed of about 10 km per hour from the side of the Home Purterus, at the speed of about 10 km per hour.

At the same time, there was a red on-and-off signal at the front door, so in such a case, the driver was obliged to temporarily set the right and the right immediately before the intersection and to safely drive the vehicle with due care to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to turn to the left as it is, due to the negligence of duty, caused the victim F ( South, 71 years old) who is going to the right from the left side of the defendant's direction to go to the right side of the G Oba in front of the defendant's vehicle to go to the ground.

As a result, the Defendant suffered a multi-faceted bid and scambling with the victim for about three weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Around 14:20 on December 20, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim J(42 years old) by booming the flaps on the ground that the trial cost had occurred with respect to the issue of the down payment of real estate in front of I real estate located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and the down payment of real estate.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 High 573"

1. Statement by the defendant in court (the fifth public trial date);

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The actual survey report, diagnosis report, and photograph of the place of accident "2017 High 718";

1. The defendant's legal statement (the sixth public trial date);

1. Each legal statement of witness K and L;

1. Statement made by the witness J in the fourth public trial protocol;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel alleged that he was a legitimate defense, although he was involved in the interrogation of the suspect in J (such as the statement of facts in the judgment of the court), it is acknowledged by the above evidence.

arrow