All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal, the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment and one year of confiscation against Defendant A, one year of imprisonment and one year of confiscation against Defendant B, and additional collection of KRW 96 million) is deemed to be too uneasy and unreasonable.

2. As to the grounds for appeal of this case, the illegal game room business like the crime of this case, such as the crime of this case, is highly harmful to the general public, such as encouraging a speculative spirit of the general public and undermining their desire to work, it is necessary to strictize them. The scale of each game of this case does not small, and profits acquired from the business and exchange of the game room business and the game room business seems to be considerable, and the defendants have the record of being punished for the same crime, and there is not only the fact that the defendants were punished for the same crime, but also the fact that the defendants Eul attempted to conceal the fact of unemployment on the ground of the defendant Eul's inner name in the investigation process of "I Gameland"

However, in light of the following factors: (a) the Defendants recognized all of the instant offenses during the fourth trial day of the lower court; (b) the Defendants’ depth and reflects each of the instant offenses; (c) there is a need to consider equity in the punishment against accomplices in determining the punishment against the Defendants; (d) the Defendants’ period of actual operation of the “I Gameland” was not less than 13 days; and (e) the Defendants’ additional collection of criminal proceeds from the Defendant B; and (e) other factors such as the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, health conditions, circumstances, degree of participation in the instant crime; and (e) the conditions of sentencing specified in the instant records and pleadings; and (e) the outcome of the application of sentencing guidelines by the

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.