1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Judgment

The reason why the court should explain this part of the claim for damages under the Product Liability Act is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance.

According to the above findings of the scope of damages, wrusium 1 to the Plaintiff’s vinyl is deemed to have long-term recovery period due to fallen leaves, growth axis, nutrition disorder, etc., and the Jeju wrusium average annual income from 2011 to 2013 - 12,583,406 [30,204,678 - 16,107, 307, 307, 305, - 407, 57, - 307, 57, - 167, 57, - 307, 57, - 40, 57, - 305, 50, 500, 50, 500, 507, 507, 507, 307, 504, 57, 307, 504

The income of this case was derived, and it was said that there was a loss of business operation equivalent to the above money due to the defect of the hot wave of this case.

Judgment on the argument of the defendant company and the standard for calculating the amount of damages.