logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.12.20 2018고단3363
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 through 6 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2018, the Defendant, on the Internet, received a proposal from the Defendant that “B,” stating a notice on “the large amount of know-how,” and made a conversation by communicating with “B,” a person without a name, who is named “B,” and received cash from people, will bring an amount equivalent to 4% of the amount delivered at the face of delivery as commission.”

Around that time, a person under whose name the victim was misrepresented by an investigative agency, etc. to the effect that he/she should withdraw money to an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service because his/her account was used in a crime committed by an unspecified victim, and the defendant misrepresented his/her employee of the Financial Services Commission by using a document in the name of the chairperson of the Financial Services Commission, and conspired to commit so-called phishing crimes.

On September 10, 2018, the name influor was used for the crime of E daily allowances by putting a phone to the victim C, leading the victim C to the inspection of the Seoul Western District Public Prosecutor's Office, and misrepresenting him to the inspection of the Seoul Western District Public Prosecutor's Office.

A false statement stating that “I will return money after confirmation to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service by withdrawing all the amount of money to confirm whether the Defendant has accomplices,” and the Defendant received KRW 46,395,860 from the victim six times in total from September 10, 2018 to September 17, 2018, under the direction of the victim from “F” on September 10, 2018 under the direction of the victim in front of the “H Kafbook” located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and received KRW 7,326,380 from the victim after receiving the victim’s signature from the Financial Services Commission.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with a person who was not the victim, received property from the victims by deceiving the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.With respect to C, I, J and K, respectively.

arrow