logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.21 2019나23632
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.

At the time of the accident, the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”), the insured vehicle of the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant vehicle”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant vehicle”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant vehicle”) intended to change the vehicle from the first to the second to the second to the second one on January 17, 2018 at the location of 08:14, 2018, the vehicle of the Plaintiff in the situation of the third-lane collision between the two-lanes of the above road and the two-lanes due to the other vehicles in the front to the two-lanes of the vehicle, the front part of the vehicle and the front part of the vehicle of the Defendant vehicle, which moved into the first to the first one on the right side of the vehicle of the Plaintiff while they moved into the second to the first one on the two-lanes road, and 959,450,450, 239,000 (based on recognition), and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s instant accident is bypassing to the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in order to overtake the Plaintiff’s vehicle that the Defendant’s vehicle driven over the first and second lanes to change its course from his front side.

The defendant's driver's unilateral negligence is a serious accident while entering the city.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff's vehicle has a shocked part of the right side of the defendant's vehicle, which had been changed from the first lane to the second lane, and had been changed to the first lane, and that it is almost unilateral error of the driver of the plaintiff vehicle.

B. Determination 1) The following circumstances revealed in addition to the aforementioned evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings, namely, ① the Plaintiff’s vehicle runs across a two-lanes from the first to the second-lanes, and the other vehicle (the two-lanes to the third-lanes) located in the two-lanes are in conflict with the Defendant’s vehicle moving into the first-lanes due to the two-lanes; ② the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

arrow