The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession of and reflect on the Defendant, and must support the mother.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had been punished several times due to drinking and unlicensed driving (three times a suspended sentence, three times a fine); (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (c) the blood alcohol level was very high as 0.246%; and (d) the lower court sentenced to a maximum sentence which has been sentenced to discretionary mitigation; and (e) other various circumstances, which form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, circumstances leading to the commission of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, etc., even if considering the favorable circumstances favorable to the Defendant as seen earlier, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.