logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.11.01 2017고단1216
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 03:20 on May 30, 2017, the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol, such as a 1st floor parking zone 260 zone of the 1st floor underground of the Busan-gun Apartment-gun, Busan-gun, and a Doromob dar dar fried car parked in the place after receiving a report that he/she shocked the E 7th vehicle parked in the place, and he/she driven under the influence of alcohol, such as a redlight on the face, a flag G et al. of the F District, where he/she was dispatched to the place after receiving a report that he/she shocked the E 7th vehicle parked in the place.

There is a reasonable reason to determine a person who has been requested to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting approximately 30 minutes the whole in a drinking measuring instrument.

Nevertheless, the Defendant dumped a drinking measuring instrument, avoided it, and failed to comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

around 03:20 on May 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a D car while under the influence of alcohol at the first floor parking lot of the Busan-gun Apartment-gun, Busan-gun, and parked at that place.

K7 The car was shocked and locked in the vehicle.

The Defendant: (a) the police officer called up upon receiving a report in 112, caused the Defendant to wear the door of the driver’s seat, and demanded a alcohol measurement; (b) caused the Defendant to take a alcohol measurement on the vehicle; and (c) caused the police officer’s hand to get off the hand of G on one occasion; and (d) assaulted the police officer’s part of H by his hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement protocol with H and G;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense; Article 148-2(1)2 and Article 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act; Articles 148-2(1)2 and 44(2) of the same Act; the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Order for community service and attending lectures;

arrow