logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.06.15 2017고단2971
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s injury or damage to property;

A. On January 7, 2017, around 19:15, the Defendant injured the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant was not having followed the victim E (50) with respect to a male and female spawned in front of the Seoul Southern-gu Incheon Southern-dong Goods Storage Office on the ground that he did not bring his name to the victim E (50). However, on the other hand, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the Defendant, such as spawn salt, etc., that requires two weeks of medical treatment by cutting down the spawn belt that he was on the spawn and shouldered.

B. The Defendant damaged the property by walking the door of the store of wooden materials managed by E at the same time and at the same place as the preceding paragraph, and thereby damaging the door of the store of materials owned by the victim’s name, such as allowing the victim to walk the door of the store.

2. The Defendant injured Defendant B, at the same time and at the same place as 1. Paragraph 1. Paragraph 1., on the ground that the Victim F (F. 69 years of age) f.m. f. assaulted A with her belt, he saw the victim’s f.m., and her b by hand, carried the victim’s f.m., and her f.m., carried the victim’s f.m. f., with her f.m. and carried the victim’s f.s.

3. From January 7, 2017, the Defendants’ interference with the Defendants’ performance of their official duties were h, and there was a police officer H and I belonging to the Incheon Southern-dong Police Station G District, which called the “D Kable” 2nd floor of “D Kable” upon receipt of a report from 112 on the 19:20 on January 7, 201 that there was a person who was under influence of alcohol in the smoking room. Defendant A conspired with the above police officers H, I h, I h, and I h, and I h, I again h, I h, and I h h h, and I h h h h, I h h, and I h h h h h, and I h h h h h n to arrest Defendant A as an act of interference with the performance of official duties, thereby obstructing the Defendants’ legitimate execution of duties in the instant case and arrest of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.

arrow