logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.12.02 2020고단2744
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 24, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution for violating the Labor Standards Act at the Seoul Eastern District Court on July 24, 202 and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 1, 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant is the representative director of D who entered into a contract for the entrustment management of the above collective housing between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019 with the “C apartment” located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim E is the chairman of the council of occupants’ representatives of the above collective housing.

After the expiration date of the above contract period, the Defendant was faced with the situation in which it was impossible to conclude a re-contract due to the failure to pay in full national and local taxes, and had the previous tax payment certificate forged to exercise the tax payment certificate by changing the date and validity period of the tax payment certificate issued with the purport that there was no delinquent amount.

1. On December 2, 2019, the Defendant forged a public document, or forged a document, at the office of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F and D, Inc., Ltd., Inc., Ltd., with a computer, printed out the paper that entered “the paper that entered B,” on October 29, 2019,” stating that “the Defendant shall prove that there is no amount in arrears,” and “D,” a corporation, etc., with a previous certificate issued, issued the paper, stating that “the paper that was printed out on October 29, 2019” in the name of the director of the tax office having jurisdiction over the electronic document, “the date of issuance of the certificate of tax payment,” as above, was issued to the head of the office of the Song-gu, Seoul, Songpa-gu, and the paper, stating “the date of validity of the certificate, November 28, 2019.” On the same day, the paper can be printed out by misunderstanding and then deliver it to the head of the above E on the same day.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a certificate of tax payment under the name of the head of the Songpa District Tax Office, which is an official document, and exercised as if he were issued a forged certificate of tax payment.

2. An attempted fraud.

arrow