logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.13 2016나11884
계약이행보증금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the portion added to the following:

2. On the 18th page of the first instance judgment, the addition shall include the following:

As to this case, the Defendant: (a) subcontracted the construction work equivalent to KRW 4,947,215,570 out of the remaining remaining construction cost; (b) KRW 5,827,89,278 to the privately constructed construction; (c) KRW 880,683,70 (i) KRW 5,827,89,278 - 4,947,215,570). Considering the reduction of construction cost directly executed by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s actual loss is merely KRW 29,434,920, which is only KRW 375,57,50 (the remainder of construction cost applied the 3,35,379,1373,13,13, and the remainder of construction cost to which the 3,575,575,385,315,39,375,39,375, and 47,57, and 54,39,31,5,25,35, and 315,2,37, etc.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is above.

arrow