The defendant's natives are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding the facts) is that the defendant is placed on the victim's vehicle while towing the bicycle and building the crosswalk, and the victim's vehicle passes several crosswalks, it can be recognized that the location of the accident, such as the defendant's change in the crosswalk, is on the crosswalk, but the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged.

2. Determination:

A. In full view of the following facts and circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant was damaged by taking the front part of the victim's vehicle, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below, as the front part of the bicycle driven by the defendant.

1) The victim consistently fell under the investigative agency and the court of the court below, and consistent in the court below, “The victim was making a bypass at the shooting distance c village entrance, and the defendant was driving along the bicycle, leading to the Defendant’s bicycle knife part, and the front part of the victim’s vehicle was collisioned.

At the time, the bus was in a situation where the view of the city was well seen, and the bus was faced after the passage of the bus.

After shock, the Defendant got a bicycle back immediately from the place of the bicycle.

“There are no other circumstances to suspect the credibility of the above statement.”

2) On the contrary, the Defendant’s vindications or arguments are not consistent, such as the change of the contents multiple times as follows, and the explanation of the situation at the time of the accident is interrupted.

① In the initial statement at an investigative agency, the Defendant, “A while towing a bicycle on India, was diving on the crosswalk, and the victim’s vehicle was driven on the road by 3 to 4 meters away from the victim’s vehicle rapidly.

“The 11th statement of the investigation record” (the 11th statement of the traffic accident). (2) However, as a result of the following investigation, the existence of CCTV images was heard, the vehicle immediately before the accident.