The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. On September 21, 2019, at around 04:20 on September 21, 2019, the Defendant used the above shopping mall in the third floor of the building Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the third floor of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the victim of the above D and the building of the victim B (the 36 years of age), who was s

2. Determination

A. The facts charged in the instant case cannot be prosecuted against the intent expressed by the victim pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, as a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, since the victim expressed his/her intention that he/she does not want to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

(b) Dismissal of application for compensation: Article 32 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings;