1. Defendant C:

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 46,137,68 and its related KRW 5% per annum from July 5, 2013 to March 19, 2015, and 5% per annum from March 19, 2015.

1. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims against Defendant C

(a)the description of the reasons for the change in the attachment of the claim;

(b) Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act:

2. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims against defendant D

A. On March 26, 2013, Plaintiff A deposited KRW 10 million in the national bank account (Account Number E) in Defendant D’s name, and KRW 18 million in the agricultural bank account in Defendant D’s name on April 19, 2013. (2) Plaintiff B deposited KRW 14 million in the said national bank account in Defendant D’s name on March 26, 2013, and KRW 4 million in each of the said agricultural bank accounts on April 5, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The plaintiffs' assertion and judgment 1) The defendant D heard the phrase that the inspection conducted by the plaintiffs by the plaintiffs will immediately enter an auction due to the building owner's financial obligation, etc., and it is said that there is a resolution method if the defendant C has a lot of money to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs talked about the above circumstances to the defendant C, and although the defendant C has a lot of certificate of deposit in Seoul area, it is necessary to find the above deposit amount of 45 million won in cash to find the above deposit. First of all, if the plaintiffs have changed money, it is necessary to find the above deposit and purchase the inspection or to build a new inspection. The defendant D also purchased the inspection in the form of a real estate brokerage business, or 100 won in 200 won in 300 won in 190,000 won in 20,000 won in 20,000 won in 20,000 won in 30 won in 20.