1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the first instance is as follows, and the following parts are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for adding the defendant's arguments and judgments to the following parts, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The corrected part and the added part; and

가. 수정하는 부분 ⊙ 제1심 판결 제3면 제12행부터 제13행까지의 “갑 4, 8 내지 17, 19호증, 갑 제4호증의 2, 3, 4, 을 1, 2, 6호증의 각 기재”를 “갑 4, 8 내지 17, 19호증, 을 1, 2, 6호증(가지번호 있는 것은 각 가지번호 포함, 이하 같다)의 각 기재”로 수정한다.

⊙ 제1심 판결 제4면 제6행의 “2010. 10.경까지”를 “2010. 11.경까지”로 수정한다.

⊙ 제1심 판결 제5면 아래에서 제4행의 “이 판결 선고일”을 “제1심 판결 선고일”로, 제8면 아래에서 제9행의 “증인 H”을 “제1심 증인 H”으로 각 수정한다.

⊙ 제1심 판결 제6면 제1행부터 같은 면 아래에서 제2행까지를 아래와 같이 수정한다.

1) The defendant asserts that since the victim of the tort of this case is either the film festivals enforcement committee of this case, which is not the plaintiff, or the grant of subsidies, the plaintiff cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim. 2) First, we examine the argument that the victim is each film festivals enforcement committee of this case.

According to the above evidence, as the organizer of each film film of this case, the Plaintiff organized a film festivals execution committee under the supervision of the Executive Committee as a temporary organization in charge of preparation and progress of the film festivals each year, and recognized the fact that each film film execution committee of this case was sentenced to conviction in the relevant criminal case as the victim of the embezzlement of this case.

However, according to the above agreement and relevant provisions, the agreement of this case is examined.