1. The Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable:

A. From September 22, 2017, Plaintiff A 14,437,042 and its related thereto:

B. The plaintiff B.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants operated the metal product wholesale with the trade name “H” between husband and wife, and the Plaintiffs are workers employed by the Defendants and provided labor.

B. The Plaintiffs worked at H during the period specified in the following table working period, and the Defendants did not pay the Plaintiffs wages and retirement allowances equivalent to the amount stated in the following table’s unpaid amount.

Workers’ work period unpaid B from April 15, 2014 to September 7, 2017, KRW 437,042, B from April 17, 2014 to August 26, 2017, KRW 13,780,630 C from October 29, 2014 to September 11, 2017, KRW 857,853 D from June 15, 2015 to September 15, 2017, KRW 327,504 E from October 19, 2016 to September 15, 2017; the purport of each of subparagraph 1 to 3, 97,500, and each of subparagraph 2-1, 2-1, 2-1, 2-1, 3-1, 3-1, 2-1, 3-1, 3-1, and 50

2. According to the above facts of determination, the defendants jointly and severally liable for 14,437,042 won, such as unpaid wages, etc., and 13,780,630 won, such as unpaid wages, etc., to the plaintiff Eul from September 22, 2017 to 14 days after the date of retirement, and for 11,857,853 won, such as unpaid wages, etc., to the plaintiff Eul from September 10, 2017 to September 16, 2017 to 14 days after the date of retirement, and for 11,857,853 won, such as unpaid wages, etc., to the plaintiff Eul from September 16, 2017 to 14 days after the date of retirement, and for 3,957,507, 201, and damages for delay from September 16, 2017 to 200 days after the date of retirement.

As to this, the defendants sought dismissal of the claim, and argued that the payment was made in equal installments when the funds were to enter, and that the full amount is to be repaid in installments. However, even if they were to be arranged as partial repayment defense, there is no evidence supporting this. Therefore, the defendants' defense is without merit.