1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the part "damage due to damage to the plaintiff's vehicle" and the part "e.g. litigation theory" in the 7th and 19th of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the 7th of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the 19th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 19th of the

2. The high portion “C. Damage caused by the destruction of the Plaintiff’s car was calculated as KRW 12,780,000 at the time the Plaintiff entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Han Lan Property Loss Insurance around October 2012. The value of the Plaintiff’s car was paid KRW 5,060,000 as insurance money due to the instant accident, and KRW 3,550,000 as proceeds from the sale of the remainder of the Plaintiff’s car. Therefore, the amount of damages caused by the instant accident is KRW 4,170,00 (= KRW 12,780,000-5,000 - KRW 3,50,000). However, the Plaintiff’s claim for damages from the alteration of the claim and the cause of the claim on August 16, 2016 to the extent of the damages arising from the tort exceeds the amount of KRW 3,560,000 for each of the above claims for damages.

Therefore, the Defendant’s damages amounting to KRW 80,91,777 (i.e., lost income amounting to KRW 39,349,780, 18,081,97 for the Plaintiff’s automobile damage amounting to KRW 3,560,000 for the damages amounting to KRW 20,000 for the damages amounting to KRW 3,560,000 for the damages amounting to KRW 5,00 for the damages amounting to the Plaintiff.