logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.10.12 2016고단3001
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B imprisonment for three months, and Defendant C for a fine of five million won, respectively.

Defendant .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, from September 2, 2014 to April 14, 2015, was in charge of the sales of mobile phones, openings, and management of each of the above I’s stores in the same cityJ from April 14, 2015 to October 14, 2015. A, from around October 2015 to around December 2015, the Defendant was in charge of the sales of mobile phones, openings, and managing each of the above I’s stores in the same cityJ from around December 2015 to around July 4, 2016.

The defendant of the forgery of private document or the uttering of a falsified document was willing to arbitrarily open a new mobile phone in the name of the customers by using a written application for subscription and a copy of identification card, etc. prepared by receiving a request from the customers, such as visitors who visit the above store, or those who visit the above store, and sell it to the purchaser of the mediumphone.

On July 2, 2016, the Defendant entered “L”, “M”, “M”, “M in the address column,” and “L” in the customer column of the application for subscription in the name column in the name column of the new contract form for the SKT service, which was kept in G at the above Irl point in Silung-si, G, and then sent it by facsimile as if it was a document duly formed.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged one copy of a new mobile phone service contract in L's name, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and used it, from February 27, 2016 to the same year.

7. Until February 1, 200, the Defendant forged a new contract for mobile phone service in the name of another person over 25 times in total as shown in the attached list of crimes (1), and sent the forged documents to the employees under the name of the said snow by facsimile, as if they were duly formed.

B. The Defendant’s occupational embezzlement is arbitrarily another person as above.

arrow