beta
Text
1. Defendant C, D, and E in excess of the part against Defendant B among the judgment of the first instance court and the amount ordered to be paid below.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the F land in Naju-si, who produces and sells the spaw and fishing, etc., and the Defendants are G clan members.
B. H land adjacent to the above F land is owned by the above clan (hereinafter “Defendant clan”). The above F land was installed a passage connecting the Plaintiff’s land and the public service to the Defendant’s land (hereinafter “instant access road”); and the Plaintiff has used the instant access road to the low temperature warehouse located on the Plaintiff’s land in order to set a good wave, distribution, etc.
C. However, there is a dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant clan, and the Defendants conducted a boundary survey of the Defendant’s land through the literature relay meeting on March 18, 2012, and warn the Plaintiff of occupation of the Plaintiff and delegated all the authorities for reinstatement to the president of the executive branch, who decided to exercise the right of the Defendant’s clan against the Defendant’s refusal to exercise his/her right.
On April 9, 2012, Defendant D, C, and E (hereinafter “Defendant, etc.”) surveyed the boundary of the Defendant’s land on the instant access road, and confirmed that the instant access road is owned by the Defendant’s clan, and connects the instant access road to the hump to the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump, and installed a wooden signboard stating “Prohibition of Access” in front, thereby completely blocking the entry of low temperature warehouses of vehicles and farming machines.
(hereinafter “instant interference”). D.
Accordingly, on June 15, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a provisional disposition against the Defendants, such as Gwangju District Court 2012Kahap814, and the said court determined that the Plaintiff did not have access to the road other than the access road in this case, and decided that the Defendants discontinue the instant interference and remove the obstacles.
E. Meanwhile, the defendant et al. stored the plaintiff in the low temperature warehouse by the instant interference act.