1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's ground of claim

A. On November 15, 2011, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement to lease the first floor E of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan DD Building owned by the Defendant, C, and the Plaintiff (hereinafter the instant store) to the Defendant and C.

(B) the lease of this case

The Plaintiff agreed to pay the Defendant the public charges such as environmental improvement charges and traffic inducement charges imposed on the instant store under the instant lease agreement with the Defendant, C, and the increased property tax due to the establishment of entertainment tavern in the instant store.

C. As a merchant, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff is the sum of KRW 14,350,00 in the rent for June 2016 to December 12, 2016, KRW 3,658,710 in the increased property tax agreed upon by the Defendant to be borne by the Defendant out of property tax for July 2016, KRW 14,695,010 in the increased property tax for September 2016, KRW 669,970 in the charges for causing traffic congestion in October 2016, KRW 2,188,70 in the property tax agreed upon by the Defendant to be borne by the Defendant (i.e., KRW 484,830 in the year 2013, KRW 1,569,00 in the property tax for KRW 1,569,050 in the property tax for KRW 205,360 in the amount of property tax for KRW 3085,500 in the aggregate).

2. Judgment on the ground of the Plaintiff’s claim

A. In this case, it may be deemed that the Plaintiff is liable to the Defendant for contractual liability as a party to the instant lease agreement. As such, this argument is examined as follows: (a) there is no evidence to prove that the Defendant entered into the instant lease agreement with the Plaintiff; (b) public charges such as environmental improvement charges and traffic inducement charges imposed on the instant store; and (c) the Defendant agreed to pay the increased property tax due to the establishment of entertainment tavern in the instant store.