logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.09.05 2018고단4178
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who had operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of “E” after putting sedi, mixed sea, etc. on the 2nd floor of Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, from around February 2018 to April 16, 2018.

On April 16, 2018, the Defendant arranged female employees to receive cash of 1.40,000 won from the police officers belonging to the Incheon Regional Police Agency who visited customers at the above E businesses around 21:00.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence adopted and examined by the court.

A. On July 4, 2018, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 2 million at the Incheon District Court for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, including the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (or brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts), and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 21, 2018.

B. The criminal facts of the above final and conclusive judgment were as follows: “The defendant conspired with F on April 17, 2018, and arranged commercial sex acts by allowing police officers who controlled customers by pretending to be customers in B and on the second floor of Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Incheon, to receive 70,000 won of drinking expenses, including handbath service (the act of harming male sexual organ by hand) and sent them to Thailand’s national G and sent them similar behavior.

“....”

According to the above facts, the crime committed in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic for which the above summary order has become final and conclusive, and the facts charged in this case do not conflict with the legal interest of damage, with the same period of crime, and the method of crime is also identical.

The criminal intent of the defendant was severed or renewed;

As there is no circumstance to find out, there is a relation of a single single crime as it is recognized that the defendant has been engaged in a single and continuous criminal act under the single and continuous criminal intent.

It is reasonable to view it.

Therefore, the above-mentioned summary order is effective.

arrow