Text
1. The Plaintiff:
(a) Defendant B and C shall have the real property listed in the separate sheet No. 1;
B. Defendant D shall set out in [Attachment 2].
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project partnership whose rearrangement zone covers H one unit of land, including the site of each real estate listed in the attached list.
B. On July 24, 2006 and December 31, 2007, the Plaintiff obtained authorization for the establishment of a astronomical market on July 24, 2006, and obtained authorization for the implementation of a project on December 31, 2007, attached documents, such as a project implementation plan to modify the authorized contents, articles of association, etc., and obtained the authorization for the implementation of a project from the astronomical market on September 16, 2013, and obtained the authorization for the implementation of a project from the astronomical market on April 3, 2015 based on the authorization for the implementation of a project, and the astronomical market publicly announced the contents of the authorization for the above management and disposal plan on April 13,
C. Defendant B is the owner of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1. Defendant D is the owner of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, and Defendant D is the Plaintiff’s members who filed an application for parcelling-out within the period of application publicly notified by each Plaintiff as the owner of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, and Defendant C is the lessee of Defendant C, E, F, and G, and Defendant C is the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1; Defendant E is the first floor of 69.91 square meters (automobile insurance-general), Defendant F is the first floor of 202.3 square meters among the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, and Defendant G occupies occupies 301 square meters
On June 16, 2016, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 300,481 as the transfer cost of movable property for Defendant C. On August 18, 2016, deposited KRW 2,650,000 as the compensation (transfer cost) pursuant to the expropriation ruling for Defendant E on behalf of Defendant E., and on April 6, 2017, the Plaintiff paid KRW 323,890, such as the relocation cost, and KRW 323,890, such as the relocation cost, to Defendant G, respectively.
E. Some land owners in the rearrangement zone are the Daejeon District Court 2016Guhap1135, Daejeon District Court 2016, and the Daejeon District Court 2016Guhap103162, and the lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the management and disposition plan is filed.