logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.05.16 2013고단615
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 10, 2013, the Defendant of the Special Act on the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Act on the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) driven a car into B CC on February 10, 2013, and driven a three-lane high speed road between the powder-water and the water, which is located in front of the solar apartment in the Dong-dong, Seo-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, into the speed of about 90km from the edge of the end of the punishment.

At the time, snow was slicked on the road, and the central separation was installed at that place, so there was a duty of care to reduce speed and accurately operate the steering direction and brakes to those engaged in driving of motor vehicles, and to prevent accidents in advance by passing along the right side of the central separation zone.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and proceeded as is without reducing speed, and the Defendant was under the influence of driving the central separation zone along two lanes from the direction of the Defendant’s running. The Defendant was under the influence of driving the victim C( South, 71 years old) in front of the victim C(Seoul, 71 years old) who was driving along the two lanes.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as satisfinal finites, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above.

2. Around 06:30 on February 10, 2013, the Defendant driven a car from around 6 km to B in the same distance from the roads in front of the comprehensive market for Seongdong-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul-si, to the speeding road between the 07:15 on the same day, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.2% of the blood alcohol concentration of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the alcohol appraisal report and investigation report (the application of the Madmark);

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 148-2 (2) 1 of the Road Traffic Act;

arrow