beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.06.18 2020가단7483
양수금 (소멸시효연장을위한)
Text
1. Claims between the Plaintiff and the Defendant based on the payment order in the Incheon District Court 2008 tea 4069.
Reasons
1. Claim for the interruption of the extinctive prescription of the payment order indicated in the Disposition No. 1 of which the plaintiff and the defendant indicated the claim
2. Judgment with no applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);
3. Since the instant lawsuit for the interruption of extinctive prescription is an act of managing and preserving a claim, the costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff even if winning the lawsuit.
(See Supreme Court Decision 2015Da232316 Decided October 18, 2018, etc.)