logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2020.04.29 2019나23991
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendants (the father) purchased approximately KRW 5,00 square meters among approximately 31,372 square meters in Jindo-gun D-gun, Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, and approximately KRW 3,000 among them, and the Plaintiff owned approximately approximately KRW 2,000, and the Defendants decided to newly construct and operate each of the trop farms on the ground.

B. Accordingly, the Plaintiff purchased approximately 16,529 square meters ( approximately 5,00 square meters) from E among the above D 31,372 square meters, and thereafter, the said land was divided and changed into 1,330 square meters in the D farm farm in Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, G farm, G farm, G farm, 5,783 square meters, H farm, 2,877 square meters in one field, 2,740 square meters in one field, and on April 5, 2011, the said D farm 1,30 square meters in the name of the Plaintiff and Defendant C, and the said F farm 1,160 square meters in the name of the Plaintiff and Defendant C, and 5,783 square meters in the name of the G farm 7,783 square meters ( approximately 1,750 square meters in the name of the Plaintiff, 307 square meters in the name of the Plaintiff and Defendant C C, 207 square meters in the name of the Plaintiff.

C. The Plaintiff’s construction of a mopy pattern on each of the above lands was completed on May 201, and completed around May 201, and the Plaintiff’s construction of a 1,330 square meters on each of the above lands was newly constructed on the ground of the 1,330 square meters in the above D farm farm, which was jointly used by the Plaintiff and the Defendants (hereinafter “this case’s house construction”). On the F farm 1,160 square meters and 5,783 square meters in the G farm 1,160 square meters and G farm 5,783 square meters, the Plaintiff’s ownership, H farm 2,877 square meters in the H farm and 2,740 square meters in the 1,330 square meters in each of the above land, and each of the mo

(2) The Defendant’s Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese.

From the date of completion of each of the above plantations, the Plaintiff and the Defendants began to diversary pattern. At the time, the methods of accepting, using, and draining sea water in the Plaintiff and the Defendants aquaculture are as follows.

1 The sea water of the above J-J neighboring sea located on the north side of the plaintiff and the defendants cultivation ground is going through the above J underground from the above sea.

arrow