1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to the share of 200/13,620 of the real estate listed in [Attachment 4 and 9] in [Attachment 4 and 9]

1. Determination as to claims against Defendant B, C, F, G, and E

A. On July 23, 1963, the Plaintiff was the owner of H’s land prior to the subdivision of each real estate listed in the separate sheet. On August 20, 1969, the Plaintiff: (a) on August 20, 1969, he/she intended to establish and operate NNNggggggggggrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrrrrr

B. Ground for recognition 1) Defendant B: Article 208(3)3 (Service by Public Notice)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, Defendant C, F, G, and E: Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (i.e., deemed as a confession)

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant D

A. In light of the Gap evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, 3, and 1-3 of Eul evidence Nos. 1-2, Eul evidence Nos. 2-1, 2-2, Gap evidence Nos. 4-1, 2, and Gap evidence Nos. 6, the result of appraiser M’s survey and appraisal, and the whole purport of the argument as a result of appraiser N’s appraisal of land rent, the defendant Eul purchased I’s building and its site from I’s wife as the well-known wife around the end of 2004, and I’s possession and management as I’s well-known notice from August 24, 2005 to February 23, 2016.