A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 6, 2015, the Defendant refused to leave, despite having received a request for the eviction from the injured party D at the victim’s residence at 305 Dong-dong 1301, the Defendant failed to comply with the request, thereby refusing to leave.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, does not comply with a request to leave from the President of the Pakistan Police Station E-gu, who was dispatched to the site upon receipt of a report at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, but does not comply therewith;

What is the speech within the meaning of this Article;

N. N.N. Doz.

“In doing so” and breathing the F in his hand and breathing the F’s breath.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Photographs (it does not constitute a crime of refusing to leave because he/she was unable to wear clothes due to the fact that the defendant and his/her defense counsel have refused to leave;

However, according to the evidence duly adopted by this court, the witness D demands the defendant to confirm the existence of his/her house with his/her husband and wife, the defendant's non-compliance with such demands, reported to 112, and the police officer F, who called out, demanded the defendant to leave the place of his/her house, but the defendant's non-compliance with such demand is recognized, and the defendant is proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that the defendant's non-compliance with the demand to leave from the damaged person in spite of the demand to leave the place

1. Articles 319(2) and 319(1) of the Criminal Act of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (not refusing to leave), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant did not comply with the request for withdrawal.