logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.07.08 2019가단143497
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the plaintiff was a cooperative established to implement the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project, and was authorized on August 30, 2018, and this was publicly notified on September 6, 2018, and the housing of this case is located in the plaintiff's business area.

The plaintiff asserts that the defendant is obligated to deliver the house of this case to the plaintiff according to the public notice of the above management and disposition plan.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit, since the fact that the defendant did not possess the house of this case as of the date of closing argument of this case does not conflict between the parties.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. However, after the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case, considering that the defendant's claim was dismissed as a director of the house in this case after the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case, the costs of lawsuit are to be borne by each party. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow