logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.10.06 2014가합204943
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 127,310,233 as well as 6% per annum from August 1, 2014 to October 28, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that engages in the manufacturing and distribution business of the textile products, and the Defendant is a person who runs the manufacturing and wholesale business of the original group with the trade name “B.”

B. If the Plaintiff concludes a sales contract that provides the Defendant with the prime body and the director, etc., and purchases the prime body and the staff necessary for the prime body and the Arabic products, and supplies them to the Defendant through the annual and direct process, the Defendant made a continuous transaction from January 2012 to July 2014 by settling the price for the purchase of the raw materials, including the cost of the prime body, the cost of the annual association, and the cost of the production, and the cost of the settlement received from the customer, to the Plaintiff.

C. The Defendant’s total amount of the purchase price for the goods delivered by the Plaintiff until July 31, 2014 is KRW 127,310,233.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 3 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the unpaid price of KRW 127,310,233 and damages for delay from the date following the end of the final supply period for which the plaintiff seeks to seek.

3. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. The Defendant’s defense 1) occurred several times due to the defectiveness of the habitats supplied by the Plaintiff, and there was damages, such as return from the Defendant’s business partner or compensation for the damages therefrom. The damages suffered by the Defendant due to the defect of the original unit supplied by the Plaintiff are as follows: The defective amount of the product name supply time (the original 1 EJ-1280,000,000 chlorates on or around March 3, 2012, around 2013, around 2013, around 2013, around 200 10,000 chlorates and 10,000 chlorates and 10,000,000 chlodsiums and tissuess around May 2012, around 2000, around 300,007 JJ36, 207, 2005, 207.

arrow