Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On June 27, 2013, the Daegu District Court sentenced a suspended sentence of two years in August to a violation of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Concealment of Criminal Proceeds at the Daegu District Court.

7. 5. The judgment became final and conclusive.

H is the president of the administration of the illegal multi-level receiving company, such as the LAI and the LAB, in collusion with the president, K, etc. from around 2004 to October 31, 2008, engaging in the similar receiving company in Daegu, Incheon, and Busan, which habitually prevents the crime of habitual fraud in the multi-level financial process. On November 2, 2008, the police investigation conducted around November 2, 2008 to escape from China to the damaged China, and was arrested in the public space in China around October 10, 2015. On January 4, 2016, the Daegu District Court was detained by a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) and is still pending trial.

Defendant

A is the same as H’s high school, L is all the two parts of M, which is the violence organization in Daegu area, and Defendant B is an employee of fugitive Dong, and N is an former police official who was removed on March 5, 201 and was discharged from office on July 11, 2001 to May 26, 2008, and was in charge of the investigation of multi-level cases, such as receipt of financial similarity, etc., while serving at the O team of the Daegu East Police Station in the Daegu East-gu Police Station from July 11, 2001 to May 26, 2008.

On the other hand, around October 31, 2008, H requested P to exchange in cash the receipts of KRW 1.922,370,000 from the crime proceeds acquired in the course of operating the above illegal multi-level receiving company. P was introduced by anyone who would exchange them through Q, his own land around that time, and R embezzled the proceeds of the crime committed in the course of money laundering.

Accordingly, in order to find the R that embezzled the above criminal proceeds, H confirmed the location of R that escaped to China by using violence organized by Defendant A, Defendant B, L, and ship structure, etc., and attempted to recover the above criminal proceeds.

1. Defendant A’s non-competence (2016 Gohap 26 Gohap 2016 Gohap 1) (hereinafter “Defendant”), along with L, around November 208.