All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on Defendant A’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s determination that the Defendant was guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning is justifiable.

In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal doctrine

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to Defendant B’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that the lower court convicted Defendant B of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which is included in the facts charged against Defendant B, on the grounds indicated

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.