A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 24, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for larceny by the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 21, 2016 in the Incheon Detention House.

On October 23, 2016, the Defendant of criminal facts of the 2016 Highest 7945, on the roads of the office of the police assigned for special guard in front of the office under the jurisdiction of the victim D (51 years of age) located in Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Seoul around October 23, 2016, stating that the victim would not raise any objection against the Defendant

For the reason that he did assault the victim by breaking the victim's breath's breath.

"2017 Highest 266"

1. On December 12, 2016, around 17:30 on December 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim G, located in the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City F, an order of Byung who was issued with the net country and the small-scale State, with the price paid normally.

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the price, even if he was provided with the net state and sub-state from the injured party due to the lack of money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and was provided with 3,000 won as well as 100 won as the market price to the net f,00 won of the market price from the victim.

2. The Defendant’s insult is a large voice to the victim I, who is a police official called to the site after receiving 112 reports, among the 10 persons, such as the date, time, place, restaurant employees, and customers as stated in paragraph 1, and the victim I, who is a police official called to the site, “this bit of bitbit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a x

저래라야”, “ 돈 주면 될 꺼 아냐”, “야 이 개 놈의 새끼야”, “ 법대로 해 썅놈의 새끼야 ”라고 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

"2017 Highest 473"

1. On September 10, 2016, the Defendant ordered the victim’s alcohol, etc. as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the food value, and as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the food value, the Defendant’s order is sufficient from the victim’s injury.