beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a freight vehicle of 1.4 tons in B.
On February 21, 2020, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 18:00, and proceeded along the three-lane of the fire station distance in front of the fire station distance in the Gu, Seosan-si, Seosan-si along the three-lane of the road.
Since there is an intersection where a signal apparatus is installed, in such a case, there was a duty of care to observe the signal to a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, and to drive the motor vehicle safely by driving the wheel and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the system of steering the motor vehicle accurately.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to proceed to red signals, thereby violating the signal, and received the front part of the DNA car driven by the injured party C (Nam and 64 years old) under the new code from the right side of the Defendant’s proceeding, from the right side of the cargo vehicle of the Defendant.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by negligence in the above business, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement to C by the police;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1. A medical certificate;
1. A written estimate (the defendant and his defense counsel argued that there was no shock to the extent that the victim was injured, but the process and result of the instant accident recognized by the evidence revealed earlier (the accident between the cargo vehicle and the passenger car, according to the evidence No. 11 of the evidence record, etc., it seems that the victim was not simply a contact with the victim as alleged by the defendant), the victim's attitude (the victim 64 was immediately her accident following the accident), and the victim's attitude (the victim was immediately her accident, and the medical certificate was issued after being treated several times, and there was no specific reason to suspect credibility in the process of issuing the written diagnosis.