The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below to the defendant against the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that there is no significant damage caused by the instant crime, and that all damaged items were returned to the victim, and that the Defendant recognized the crime and is in profoundly against the Defendant.

However, the instant crime was committed by opening a door of a vehicle parked on the street and cutting off or attempted crimes, and in light of the planning and repetition of the crime, etc., the case is not less complicated, in light of the following factors: (a) the Defendant was punished by the larceny crime; (b) there are many criminal records and multiple criminal records; (c) the lower court appears to have rendered the sentence by taking into account the favorable circumstances and unfavorable circumstances of the Defendant as above; and (d) other all the circumstances that are conditions for the sentencing indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, occupation, family relation, etc., are considered as inappropriate.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.