(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.06.20 2018고정209

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.06.20 2018고정209

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is all the form of the victim B.

On September 24, 2017, at around 11:05, the Defendant expressed the victim’s friendly E on the road located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, that she was back to the victim while drinking the victim’s her friendly E on the road. The victim saw the victim’s her her son who her bat with the Defendant’s her bat, and her her bat with the Defendant’s her her bat, and her her bat with another hand, followed the victim’s her her bat with the Defendant’s her bat, and followed the victim’s her bat with the Defendant’s her bat

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The defendant's medical certificate of injury (the defendant and his defense counsel) asserts that illegality is excluded as a reasonable act permissible in light of social norms, since the defendant's act was resistanceed to obstruct the interview negotiation with the defendant's children and to oppose it by exercising violence first.

The circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., ① the dispute between the Defendant and the victim arose in the process of returning to the house after the interview negotiation is completed. As such, the victim interfered with the actual infringement of the visitation negotiation right.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the victim’s act was hard to see, (b) the victim first flapsing and attacked; (c) the Defendant used violence, such as flabing and sating flabing, etc. in order to oppose it; (d) the victim was 10 days before flab and the Defendant did not have a big difference in the degree of injury on both sides, such as 14 days of flabing; and (e) the degree, form, and degree of injury, etc. of each side, the Defendant’s act has the character of attack at the same time as

It is difficult to see it.

Therefore, the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate act permitted by political party defense and social norms.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2019.05.29 2018노4127

-대전지방법원 2018.04.12 2017노2868

-대전지방법원 2017.05.25 2016노3627

-광주지방법원 2018.12.06 2018노1880

-광주지방법원 2017.05.23 2016노4674