The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) did not say that the victim was “missent”, and the victim’s right buckbucks are not able to take the victim’s right right right bucks, and the victim’s right bucks are not able to take the victim’s right right bucks, and the victim’s high return and sexual part was flicked by indecent act.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court as well as the statement by F of the witness of the party examination witness F, the Defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that the victim was flicked, flick, and flicked by indecent act by force. A.

The victim, at the investigative agency and the court of the court below, consistently stated that “the Defendant’s assaulted against the young male(s) and that “the son himself was the son’s son.” The Defendant continued to assault his son and her son, and thus, the Defendant was called the son.” Accordingly, the Defendant was frighted to the son’s son’s son, and the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son and son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son and son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son, and reported the 112th son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.”

B. The police officer F, upon receipt of a report, stated in the court of the trial that “I am involved in an indecent act against the victim to the effect that “I am on the victim’s own sexual organ,” at the same time, the police officer stated in the victim’s statement to the effect that “I am on the victim’s sexual organ. If I am misunderstanding, I would see it only because I am misunderstanding.” However, the victim expressed that I would be able to use the sexual organ, and that I am perfect the victim’s statement.”